Globalization Quotes

Globalization means using slaves to manufacture products that are then sold to the unemployed!

We must create a kind of globalization that works for everyone... and not just for a few.

In the cabaret of globalization, the state shows itself as a table dancer that strips off everything until it is left with only the minimum indispensable garments: the repressive force.

If globalization seeks to bring all of us together, but to do so respecting each person, each individual person's peculiarity, that globalization is good and makes us good and grow and leads to peace.

The only thing worth globalizing is dissent.

Globalization, far from putting an end to power diplomacy between States, has, on the contrary, intensified it.

One of the paradoxes of globalization is that, in the developing world, we've seen massive reductions in property.

Globalization is not a monolithic force but an evolving set of consequences - some good, some bad and some unintended. It is the new reality.

Diversification and globalization are the keys to the future.

The regime of globalization promotes an unfettered marketplace as the dynamic instrument organizing international relations.

Wild globalization has benefited some, but it's been a catastrophe for most.

We also have a cultural phenomenon: the emergence of a global culture, or of cultural globalization

Trips are part of humanity. Emigration is a part of humanity. And it's ever more dynamic due to globalization.

I support freedom and I support a free market economy, but it should be a socially oriented market economy. I support globalization, but it should be globalization with a human face.

The downsides of globalization are indeed painful, ... But taking the bigger pills against its ills is superior to living inside a sterile bubble.

There is a growing consensus that Globalization must now be reshaped to reflect values broader than simply the freedom of capital.

We Have Got To Bring Corporate America To Its Knees

Education, particularly higher education, will take Africa into the mainstream of globalization.

I think we will become disenchanted with the glamour of globalization.

It is people who are the objects of globalization and at the same time its subjects. What also follows logically from this is that globalization is not a law of nature, but rather a process set in train by people.

Contrary to the received wisdom, global markets are not unregulated. They are regulated to produce inequality.

Desperation is the result of globalization.

Transnational terrorism, in the form of the Salafi Jihadist movement, is fundamentally a function of globalization.

Globalizing a bad thing makes it worse. But globalizing a good thing is usually good.

We would not be enjoying those cellphones and those tablets at the price where they are had it not been for globalization, both in terms of trade and in terms of constant technological innovation.

People now realize that globalization is not only for the multi-nationals and the circulation of money.

There are dangers that globalization increases inequality. There are dangers that because capital is mobile and workers are not, if we are not providing them sufficient protection, that they can be left behind in this process. And that's what we have to focus on.

Contagion has become very much a phenomenon, and it's a phenomenon of globalization.

I think that globalization is partly responsible for the spread of the hostile, radical forms of Islam.

Globalization is a fact of economic life

It would never occur to me to map my research against events in my life, and the recent history of globalization seems to be part of someone else's life. Still, maybe I have been trying to fill in a history or address that amnesia for the recent past. There's so much that's opaque about the ways in which extra layers of global governance have developed since Pax Americana and really accelerated in these last thirty, forty years.

Complementing the nation-state as it reaches its limits amid globalization: That is what Europe must offer.

I don't think massification and globalization and all those other 'izations' are necessarily hostile to regionalism.

Globalization requires taking a broad contextual and long-term view.

That's just globalization. It's got good sides as well. But scenes aren't allowed to develop on their own anymore. Everyone knows about everything.

We had much freer trade in the 19th century. We have much less globalization now than we did then.

The unfolding time for the end of globalization or a worldwide deflation is much longer, certainly measured in years, if not decades.

In a world of scarce resources, globalization without new technology is unsustainable.

We have been subject to globalization and financialization and austerity and workers have been thrown under the bus while the one percent is rolling in dough.

Improved productivity is another direct benefit of globalization.

The Internet is the most effective instrument we have for globalization.

Most of the time the concept of globalization ends up sounding unnecessarily abstruse - even the name itself sounds clunky and highfalutin. And people discuss it in a way that makes it seem so impersonal. But globalization really is a concrete, fundamental fact in everybody's lives, and you really see that come to life in soccer stadiums.

Globalization has made copper and other minerals more valuable, and Ghana and Kenya have recently discovered mineral resources.

Globalization exists but we shouldn't conflate globalization with trade agreements. Trade agreements is how we can shape globalization.

Globalization is now no longer an objective but an imperative, as markets open and geographic barriers become increasingly blurred and even irrelevant.

Globalization is simply opening the free marketplace to encompass the entire world.

Consumption has massively benefited from globalization.

The disruption caused by globalization and technology (what Tom Friedman calls hyperconnectedness) will be around for the rest of our professional lives.

I think the fashion industry, as a result of globalization, has undergone a uniformity. I'm not saying that's good or that's bad but that is my observation.

Most of the time the concept of globalization ends up sounding unnecessarily abstruse - even the name itself sounds clunky and highfalutin.